Why is that man hesitant to move forward even though he seems to be interested in you? Maybe your overly cold reaction made him a little frosty. Men are actually very unconfident creatures and need your response to affirm.
How to tell on a first date
On a first date, do you prefer each other to be reserved or enthusiastic? In a relationship, responsiveness implies that the responding party understands, values, and supports an important part of the other person’s self-concept and is willing to invest resources in the relationship. Thus, whether a potential partner is “easygoing” or “iceberg beauty” may be a behavioral trait of interest in the process of choosing a long-term partner and building an intimate relationship.
How do you interpret the reactivity of strangers? Boys and girls have very different views. Existing research suggests that only men interpret the reactivity of heterosexual objects as “desire for sex,” whereas women do not interpret the reactivity of strangers in this way. This may be due to the fact that heterosexual responsiveness conveys different information about relationship possibilities for men and women. It has been suggested that the expression of reactivity in specific dating situations may be related to gender role stereotypes: responsive women may be perceived as more “feminine” than nonresponsive women, while responsive men may be perceived as less “manly” than aloof men. The “gender archetype” is more consistent with the so-called “gender archetype”. People who are more in line with the so-called “gendertypicality” – men with aggressive and independent traits and women with sensitive, caring traits – may be perceived as more sexually attractive (or more likely to be more “feminine”). -may be perceived as more sexuallyattractive.
Scientists use experiments to demonstrate the perceived differences between the sexes
In order to To examine whether the responsiveness of a date has an impact on his or her sexual attractiveness, social psychologist Gurit Bönbaum of the Israel Center for Interdisciplinary Studies (ICSIS) has asked whether he or she is a social psychologist. GuritE.Birnbaum and her colleagues designed an observational study and two experimental studies that explored differences in the perceptions of gender responsiveness to each other during communication in interesting experiments.
In the first study, the researchers designed a realistic interaction scenario: they had subjects talk to a stranger of the opposite sex for 5-7 minutes, and then asked the subjects to rate the stranger’s reactivity, the degree to which he or she conformed to gender archetypes (feminine or Fifty-six heterosexual male undergraduates and 56 heterosexual female undergraduates were randomly paired with an unfamiliar subject of the opposite sex. The men and women flipped a coin to determine who would act as the “discloser” and who would act as the “responder”. The discloser was asked to tell the other person about a recent negative event that had happened to him or her (e.g., failing a test, etc.), and the responder was asked to respond as much or as little as possible, as instructed by the researchers.
Self-exposed individuals were taken into a small room after completing the conversation to complete a reactivity scale that rated the extent to which they felt understood and cared for by the responder during the conversation. Self-exposed individuals were also asked to rate the respondent’s sexual attractiveness and temperament bias (the extent to which they exhibited masculinity/femininity) based on the situation during the conversation. After the evaluation, the researcher explained the purpose of the experiment to the subjects and made sure they felt good before letting them go.
The findings suggest that the respondent’s gender archetype in the eyes of the self-expositor shapes the relationship between respondent responsiveness and sexual attractiveness: men perceive women who are more responsive as more feminine and therefore more sexually attractive – which is consistent with previous research. -This is consistent with previous research findings. However, for female self-disclosers, the gender archetype of the other person did not influence the relationship between the other person’s responsiveness and attractiveness.
This, however, does not prove that women are less likely to form gender stereotypes. Researchers speculate that the above gender differences may be due to women’s tendency to be skeptical of men’s responsiveness – men are not perceived by women as lacking in masculinity when first meeting them, even if they respond enthusiastically to the topic.
However, the results of the first study did not indicate a causal relationship between perceptions of reactivity and gender prototype judgments, so the researchers designed an experiment in which subjects talked about recent negative events via chat software with a heterosexual responder acted as a researcher. events. Responders responded with standardized content – responses could be highly reactive, such as “that must have been hard for you” or “well I know how you feel”, or non-reactive, such as “listen to me”. It may be more reactive, like “That doesn’t sound so bad” or “That’s the worst”.
In this way, the researcher controlled for the effects of verbal content and other cues that might be present in face-to-face communication (e.g., smiling, physical attractiveness, etc.). After completing the online conversation, subjects similarly rated reactivity, gender prototypes, and sexual attractiveness, and obtained results consistent with the first study.
Women’s warm responses are preferred by men
The results also suggest that men use reactivity as a cue that “women are willing to date,” and that this cue activates attraction evaluation mechanisms and increases men’s motivation to engage in short-term or long-term relationships with women who are more responsive. Women, however, are more cautious in interpreting reactivity, and their impressions of strangers do not change based on the reactivity of the other person. This reflects the fact that women are more cautious in their mate selection process and tend to construct their impressions of the opposite sex through multiple behavioral indicators (rather than a single reactivity), thereby increasing the reliability of their judgments.
In a final study, Birnbaum and colleagues explored whether sexual arousal (sexualarousal) increases the sexual attractiveness of women with high responsiveness in the eyes of men. Considering that high sexual attractiveness does not necessarily indicate a greater willingness to date, the researchers also measured the subjects’ willingness to date over time. The researchers hypothesized that a woman’s responsiveness would cause men to perceive her as more feminine, feel sexually aroused, and thus find her more sexually attractive and willing to have a long-term relationship with her. The experimental procedure was similar to Studies 1 and 2, and the results largely supported the hypothesis.
Bernbaum and his colleagues noted that because the study did not further explore the subjects’ criteria for mate selection, it remains to be elucidated when and for what reasons responsiveness provokes opposite-sex courtship.
While the scientists’ experiment is just one side of the story that men place a high value on female responsiveness, the reality of human interaction shows that women with smiles always get a lot of men, which just goes to show that the scientists are right.
So if you’re single and looking for a partner to start a relationship with, in addition to taking care of yourself in terms of appearance, smiling and being generous and gentle at all times will definitely find you a lot of interested men.