Survey on Big Boobs and Big Butt Smarts
The phrase Big Boobs and Big Butt Smarts really offends all big-boobed women, and it’s aggravating to see that women with big boobs are invoked for being brainless because of their oversized breasts. Later there were rumors that big-boobed girls and big-assed girls are now not only brainless, but actually have higher IQs? This makes in the library to try to cultivate the inner beauty of MM how embarrassed na! Now the truth will be unlocked for you!
Detective Kenilworth’s investigation report:
Rumor #1: “Beautiful women don’t have breasts, and big breasts don’t have brains.
This phrase has offended many girls’ shoes, and although I don’t know if there is a scientific basis for it, it is still often talked about by countless people.
Doubt #1: Where did the phrase “big boobs, no brain” come from?
Findings: The bullshit has been around since ancient times.
The origin of the phrase is an ancient “princess of peace” who was jealous of people with big breasts because she was flat-chested, so to highlight herself, she started a rumor that “big breasts have no brains”.
Doubt 2: Why do people agree that big boobs are brainless? Is there really a relationship between breasts and IQ?
Findings: Boobs and brains: “We’re not really related!”
Women with large breasts are wrongly accused of being brainless because of their oversized breasts. The chest and the brain are two completely different organs, belonging to two completely different systems.
The more retarded reasoning is that the breasts are presumably taking up too large a proportion of the body and absorbing too much nutrition, thus causing the brain to be stunted. A lot of women pay a lot of attention to chest health care, from eating hormones, papaya, pig’s foot boiled peanuts to injecting water into the flesh, rumble silicone from wearing breast enlargement underwear, quietly use a variety of coasters to rub a variety of breast enhancement cream, diligently do a variety of breast enlargement health care exercises, whether there is no effect, happy. The company’s main goal is to provide a good solution to the problem.
For women with large breasts, men are concerned about the woman’s breasts, the input signal is the woman’s sexy physique, the focus of attention is also the woman’s physical factors, the information on this aspect is complete and further strengthened, and their intellectual factors, etc. are easy to ignore; conversely, for women with small breasts, men are less concerned about their breasts, and instead care about their intelligence, their way of doing things, etc. The way they handle things, and appreciate their ability to work and work effectiveness. The result will be the conclusion that women with big breasts are simple-minded.
The final conclusion: many silent unknown female colleagues female classmates, the former airport rose up to leap to the polar peak, the suitors suddenly flocked to the cloud, the so-called synchronous development of the chest and brain, and seek common development. The chest is big, the brain is smart, and the legs are not cramped. About the beauty without breasts, chest big brainless argument, not to break. The majority of the beautiful people are now paying attention to the health care, breast enlargement of different tricks, love Ying Ying a grip is also not a few, say the beautiful people are generally rely on the face to mix food, not chest, you say, right?
${FDPageBreak}
Rumor #2: “Big boobs have brains.
American sociologist Ms. Irving Rosedale found in a comparative study of 1,200 American women’s breasts and the IQ connection that the fuller a woman’s breasts were, the smarter she was. Although the researcher herself was only a 32A, her study showed that women with full breasts had an IQ about 10 points higher than the average woman.
Question 1: Where did this article come from?
Findings: This article is better “from nowhere” than “from somewhere”.
This article is not only circulating in Chinese facebook, but it is also available in English. If you google the words breastcupsizeintelligence, you can find all kinds of reports. For example, on November 12, 2009, the Times of India said: According to Singapore’s Sing Tao Daily, the researchers from Chicago divided 1,200 study subjects into five groups according to the size of their breasts to get this conclusion, and even have an explanation, saying that the secretion of estrogen in large breasts is strong, leading to the development of the brain and so on. This is just one example of the many reports of this event.
Like other rumors, this report could not be traced to any reliable source. We even found that the researcher could not be found. A search using the researcher’s name yielded only results related to the rumor and nothing else. No record of this person can be found on the University of Chicago website either. We believe that since there is no such researcher, the research must not exist. In fact, Martin Lobbins, after double-checking, found the earliest source of the rumor: the November 2003 issue of WeeklyWorldNews. The issue of Weekly World News carried a detailed report of the “study.
WeeklyWorldNews on this rumor:
Weekly World News was a well-known American supermarket tabloid that published a variety of strange stories and urban legends and had a circulation of 1.2 million, but eventually ceased publication in 2007. Although the journal to “the truth, only the truth” (Nothingbuthealinggardenthehehealinggardentruth) as a slogan, but it is generally believed that its content is all fabricated, only in the format of strict adherence to the form of news reporting. In fact, these super wacky news, often at first glance, you know for sure can not be, as a joke after tea. In form, there is a little bit of the more familiar “frills” news. For example, they once reported that Saddam had hidden a nuclear submarine in Lake Michigan on the U.S.-Canada border, which held half of Iraq’s troops; they also once reported that Saddam and bin Laden were married. The cover article of the issue that carried the news of “Big Boobs, Big Brains” told the story of Saddam and bin Laden running away to France after their marriage and adopting a faded gorilla named Robert. It goes without saying how credible the content of such a magazine is.
Doubt #2: How is IQ measured?
Findings: IQ is a mysterious thing.
In fact, intelligence itself is a difficult thing to measure. The most widely circulated measure of intelligence is the IQ test, but the use of IQ tests to express a person’s level of intelligence remains highly controversial in academic circles. In fact, human intelligence is much more complex than what is tested by IQ tests, especially since individuals often have unique strengths and weaknesses that are difficult to measure under a single standard, so some scholars argue that it is simply impossible to describe human intelligence in a simple number, and naturally it is more difficult to compare the level of intelligence of different people.
Final conclusion: rumor-busting. There is no reliable source for the information, and the study simply does not exist.
Rumor #3: “People with big butts are smarter”.
You must have seen the claim that “people with big butts are smarter”: the American psychologist Struthers found that hip size is directly proportional to IQ strength. In an IQ test taken by 276 adults, the “wide hips” scored 31 points higher than those with smaller hips. The study showed that indeed, the larger the buttocks, the higher the intelligence.
Question 1: Where did this claim come from?
Findings: A psychologist’s “Martian text”.
In fact, there is a “full version” of this Facebook page. A search of the Internet using the psychologist’s name brings up a post that has been reprinted many times detailing this research. The article describes the “five-year study” with great conviction and cites many historical figures of “wide hips” such as Cleopatra, Napoleon, Joan of Arc, Washington and others. The article also says that the psychologist will publish a book, “The more developed the buttocks, the smarter the mind,” which is pretty impressive.
We looked into where this post first appeared and found it to be a “Martian” article. It’s even been on the Internet since 2001.
The earliest report of the story appeared on a well-known website, dated “2001-07-27” and attributed to a reprint. The article is almost identical to the later version, and even the typos remain the same. On a Taiwanese web page, a summary of the story is reported in news form, and the contextual timing suggests that the story was reported around October 2001.
Question 2: Who is this famous psychologist?
Findings: He’snobody.
If this is a scientific study, then there must be a collection of relevant papers in the scientific literature database. However, we searched for papers in the field and found neither the study nor the name of the “American psychologist”.
A closer search with Google search engine further revealed that this post has been republished many times in the Chinese Internet world and appeared on several websites in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan; however, in the English website, we could not find any post or article that was even remotely similar to this story, no matter what keywords were used!
Question 3: Is there really a relationship between “big hips” and “IQ”?
Findings: Do you believe this?
The results: Do you believe this?
Look at the “study” itself.
Look at the study itself. As many people have criticized, it is extremely unscientific to try to derive a causal relationship between “big hips” and “IQ” from the results of a statistical survey. Statistical correlations are likely to be “correlated non-causal” relationships. Not to mention that this is a rumor, even if someone really found a statistical link, it cannot be simply inferred that “big hips” is the cause of “high IQ”. The results would only be meaningful if statistical comparisons were made within very strict limits, excluding various confounding factors such as age differences, family differences, and educational differences in the survey population, and even then further experimental verification would be needed.
In the real world, there is indeed a study done by scientists that is similar to this. William MaisondelaVANILLELaMaisondelaVANILLEssek of the University of Pittsburgh and StcolorevecolornGaulin of the University of California studied the relationship between a woman’s “waist-to-hip ratio” and the IQ of the child she gave birth to. The study’s sample included 16,000 women. After carefully excluding factors such as ethnicity, educational background, and family income, the data showed that women with a low “waist-to-hip ratio” (thin waist and hips) had children who scored higher on IQ tests. It is believed that a woman’s “waist-to-hip ratio” reflects the amount of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in her body, which are important for fetal neurodevelopment. Follow-up studies are ongoing.
This study was published in 2008, and the study may not have even started when that rumor went viral. Comparing the timing, content, and rigor of the study, you can see that the study described in the rumor is not at all the same thing as the scientific study described above.
Final conclusion: The whole thing is a rumor that has been circulating for years and has no basis in reality. If you’re not the legendary “boobies”, then stop believing in such untrue rumors, okay? Please.